Not really the “good fight” Can’t say I’m to concerned about the money.
But I have been asked to keep collecting and documenting information as well as keeping the post at the top of the list. Public awareness on some of the questionable practices being used.
But I would surely like some comments on Shaw employees and any incentives or bonuses when it comes to properties in their ownership being serviced by Shaw?
Reason being.
Earlier in the convo it was mentioned that “greed” would be one of the only reasons a Shaw employee landlord would force a tenant to sign into a Shaw service contract.
Why would a “greed” be a factor for this? Are the employees being offered anything to find new customers?
@Sadman -- I can make a guess: the more customers that sign-up with Shaw, the more likely is that your landlord will continue to be working for Shaw (installing, being on www.shaw.ca/chat or answering 1-888-472-2222.
Or, maybe the landlord holds shares in SJR.B stock, as traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange, and wants to "promote" Shaw, to increase the share-price?
Nice "bump" in the share-price. 🙂
That sort-of looks like the Egyptian Sphinx -- flat back, rising-neck, Spock-ears, and a worn-off face. 🙂
come on grand master MDK,
We all know that “bump” in the share price has to do with the Shaw/Rogers
deal in the works once the anti-monopoly laws are skirted around. Anyone with a lick of sense can see Shaw has been hemorrhaging money and Rogers only wants their coverage area and infrastructure. Sphinx 🤣
I made a decent amount off of banking on Shaw and their plight as well. Who couldn’t tell they would be bought out by one of the other providers.
still doesn’t mean I want to give back to them as they dwindle into the history books
@Sadman -- why are you selfishly "bumping down" all the new threads, by repeatedly "bumping-up" this thread?