@dietpepsirocks -- To the best of my knowledge all of those things were checked in the last ~8 months.
Check again. Disk-drives and automobile tires that were "good" 8 months ago can "blow".
> And why aren't you including noise within the node in the problems you've listed?
It is not fair to criticize me for something that I did not write.
By the way, which "node" do you mean? The cable-modem/router inside your home? The concentrator that is somewhere on your street? The Shaw router with an IP-address ending with ".1" that is the "gateway" to Shaw's "backbone" network?
Please contact Shaw, and get the Shaw Agent to remotely logon to your cable-modem, to check the "signal-strength". It could be "weak" or "out-of-specifications", and could be the source of your "slow" speeds, as evidenced by the various "speed-tests" that you have reported.
@mdk
I just spoke to a Senior Technician, they have confirmed from their end they can see at least a few issues in the node but they're going to send someone out locally to check on other things too. They have finally accepted the graph and other data for their engineers to look at to compare to the tests they have done within the last week.
In their words they said they see a problem with a modem "tap 11" with "uncorrectables" I believe they said and I asked if this is the same thing as saying noise in the node and they said yes.
They also said they don't use the speed tests that you have been referring to, that in real world situations they use the ones that I use and that their front line techs aren't taught the differences between them and aren't expected to know the difference but in their words they use the CIRA one like me and speedof.me
mdk, so far as I have mentioned to you and you dont seem to listen, every single problem I have had thus far with my internet, has been a problem within my node I'm connected to, and so far has never been a problem in my home. I explained to you earlier, that one of the Shaw engineers literally visited a residential home, and disconnected an MTS modem that was hooked up to the Shaw infrastructure that was sending noise through the node causing me problems. Something as weird as that was messing up my internet, and I feel like you should begin thinking more outside the box when it comes to this stuff because not 1 time has it been anything related to my computer, my hardware, or even the infrastructure directly outside of my house.
@dietpepsirocks -- they said they see a problem with a modem "tap 11" with "uncorrectables"
Do you understand what a "tap" is? Compare to the underground water-line running up-and-down your street. There is a "tap" into that water-line to feed water into your home. It is not the "tap" that flows water into your kitchen sink.
Shaw's taps (and the municipal water supplier's taps) can be anywhere. Shaw's taps could be on the telephone-pole outside your home, or down at the corner of your street and the next street. The water-supply taps are at your property-line, and at most road-intersections between your home and the water-reservoir at a nearby lake.
They probably said "uncorrectable errors" -- each packet of information going into (or out of) each Shaw (and non-Shaw) router has error-checking, to ensure that the packet is cleanly transmitted. You would not like a computer disk-drive that returns only 99% of what your wrote onto it. You would not like a bank that would record 99% of the money that you deposit into it.
> in their words they use the CIRA one like me and speedof.me
As I have previously written, different speed-tests have different reasons for using them. If you want to test your cable-modem and its connection to a server in the same city/town, use the Shaw Speed Test. Any poor results from that test indicate that you will have poor results with the "remote" speed-test sites (CIRA or SpeedTest.net). Similarly, after a snow-storm, if your local street is filled with snow, you cannot drive it at a summer-time speed. That slow-down on your street will delay your trip to any "remote" location (grocery store, bank).
> mdk, so far as I have mentioned to you and you dont seem to listen,
Ooh. That harsh statement is untrue, and hurtful.
To repeat what you did not hear, your problem is somewhere:
1. slow computer -- you need at least a dual-core processor running at 2.2 Ghz to run the Shaw Speed Test at its full speed;
2. faulty Ethernet cable between your computer and your cable-modem;
3. the cable-modem;
4. loose connections of the coaxial-cable between your cable-modem and the wall-socket;
5. faulty coaxial cable;
6. possibly, a faulty 1-to-2 coaxial-splitter (TV and PVR into the splitter, one cable out to the wall-socket);
7. faulty wiring inside the walls of your residence;
8. faulty coaxial-splitter inside the (locked) Shaw "demarcation box" on the outside wall of your house;
9. faulty connector on the coaxial-cable between that "demarc" box and the nearest telephone-pole;
10. damaged coaxial-cable -- bite marks from squirrels and other animals;
11. problematic Shaw infrastructure up-and-down your street, and beyond, on Shaw's network.
Since none of your diagnostics have been fruitful, ask Shaw to schedule a technician to check many of the above failure points. Contacting Shaw is the only way to get to a remedy.
This discussion forum is not a path to Shaw Support. Don't waste your time posting here. Instead, invest your time following the advice that you have been given, by contacting Shaw Support.
@dietpepsirocks You can check your modem for correctable amd uncorrectable errors too. Login to the modem, click Conmections > Shaw Network. Scroll down to the bottom of the page, you will also see your upstream amd downstream levels.
@rstraWhat are "normal" upstream levels? Over a 12 hour test period I managed to get 482 Kb (KILOBITS) per second out of an advertised "up to" 3125kbps. This is very poor and Shaw will only keep sending people to my house when that doesn't fix anything.
Is there anything I can do on my end? This is getting super frustrating.
Downstream seems fine speed wise. And no, my PC is never on WiFi. Newer PC I built with a Gigabit ethernet adapter.
The downstream section is really large, hopefully this doesn't break the page.
IndexLock StatusFrequencySNRPower LevelModulation
Downstream | Channel Bonding Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 30 | 31 | 33 |
Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked | Locked |
321000000 | 489000000 | 483000000 | 477000000 | 471000000 | 465000000 | 459000000 | 453000000 | 447000000 | 441000000 | 435000000 | 429000000 | 423000000 | 417000000 | 411000000 | 405000000 | 399000000 | 393000000 | 387000000 | 381000000 | 375000000 | 369000000 | 363000000 | 357000000 | 351000000 | 345000000 | 339000000 | 333000000 | 327000000 | 315000000 | 309000000 | 670800000 |
40.946209 | 40.946209 | 40.366287 | 40.366287 | 40.366287 | 40.366287 | 40.366287 | 40.366287 | 40.366287 | 38.983261 | 40.366287 | 40.366287 | 40.366287 | 40.366287 | 40.366287 | 40.366287 | 40.946209 | 40.366287 | 40.366287 | 40.366287 | 40.946209 | 40.366287 | 40.366287 | 40.366287 | 40.946209 | 40.366287 | 40.946209 | 40.366287 | 40.366287 | 40.366287 | 40.366287 | NA |
3.599998 | 4.000000 | 4.099998 | 3.900002 | 4.099998 | 4.099998 | 3.799999 | 3.599998 | 3.000000 | 3.000000 | 3.500000 | 3.799999 | 3.599998 | 3.700001 | 3.700001 | 4.000000 | 3.900002 | 3.900002 | 3.700001 | 3.799999 | 3.799999 | 3.700001 | 3.900002 | 4.000000 | 3.900002 | 3.900002 | 3.900002 | 3.799999 | 3.799999 | 3.700001 | 3.700001 | NA |
QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | QAM256 | OFDM |
@miX_ All your levels look great. Has the modem been swapped? Maybe they could try reprovisioning the modem. Are the upload speeds as slow on your other devices?
@rstraYep, speeds are the same across smartphones & laptop. It's a brand new modem as of about a week ago. I upgraded my plan to the "Fibre+" 1Gig in hopes that it would help and got upgraded to the XB6. The modem was reprovisioned a few days ago and the speeds have remained the same. They sent a tech out and he said the speeds should be better but everything inside the house looked great.
Also in case you're wondering there are no other switches or devices between my PC and the XB6, just an ethernet cable connecting the two.